J.J. Abrams Says They Will Not Recast Anton Yelchin in ‘Star Trek’

By July 19, 2016
anton yelchin featured image

Earlier this year, the world was shocked and saddened to hear about the sudden and unfortunate passing of Anton Yelchin, in a freak accident at his Hollywood home. Not only had the actor established himself as one of the most talented young actors of his generation, but had a string of upcoming projects that he was working on as well, which just continued to promise an even more impressive career from the young star.

One of the biggest questions following Yelchin’s death as well, was how the future Star Trek films would address the actor’s passing, and whether or not Chekov would be written out of the films, or if he would be recast.

Personally, I was hoping for the first option, since Yelchin has done such a great job as the character, it just felt wrong to think of him being recast now. While speaking with the Toronto Sun as well, J.J. Abrams seemed to feel the same way:

“I would say there’s no replacing him. There’s no recasting. I can’t possibly imagine that, and I think Anton deserves better.”

When asked whether or not the next movie would have a death or funeral scene for the character instead, Abrams replied:

“I have thought about it, we’re working on it, and it’s too early to talk about it.”

There’s some emotional intentional and unintentional tributes to Yelchin in Beyond, and I couldn’t agree with Abrams more when it comes to this. Yelchin has made a last impression on this franchise with his turn as the character, best to leave it as it is. Out of respect more than anything.

Yelchin’s last performance as Chekov can be seen in Star Trek Beyond on July 22nd.

Alex Welch

Alex Welch

Alex dreams of meeting a girl with a yellow umbrella, and spends too much time* staring at a movie screen. His vocabulary consists mostly of movie quotes and 80s song lyrics. *Debatable
  • AddisonDewitt

    More F..ING with canon…so the actor dies they may kill off a historic Trek character ? JJ Abrams and his Trek movies are trash

    • AfRo KnIgHt

      The Cinematic Star Trek Universe is instrumentally different from the Star Trek Canon. But that was why Abrams integrated time travel into the first film. The moment someone travels back in time and destroys planets and start all out war against the federation basically, is the moment that the timeline has been immeasurably altered.

      Thus, if the timeline is not the same then they canon does not necessarily apply, as time itself will ‘play out’ in a different manner. I am not saying you have to like the movies. Just trying to share some of the ‘whys’.

      Have a good day sir :)